📅Meet us at SBC Summit Americas 2026 — Fort Lauderdale, USA, May 12-14, 2026
Back to overview
Lesson 2 of 4

Commission Structures for Prop Trading

8 min read

Designing commissions for prop trading requires thinking about the purchase funnel, not the trading activity. Unlike Forex IBs who earn per lot traded, prop trading partners earn based on customer purchases. This simplifies the model but introduces its own design decisions.

Flat Amount vs. Percentage

You have two primary options for structuring partner commissions:

ModelExampleProsCons
Flat per purchase$20 per challenge soldSimple, predictableDoes not scale with challenge price
Percentage of sale15% of challenge feeScales with priceRevenue varies by challenge size

Percentage-based commissions are more common in prop trading because challenge prices vary significantly. A $50,000 account challenge might cost $300, while a $200,000 account costs $1,000. A flat $20 commission makes sense at $300 but is far too low at $1,000. A 10% commission adjusts automatically.

What Events Trigger Commission?

Unlike iGaming or Forex where there is one clear acquisition event, prop trading has multiple purchase events. You need to decide which ones generate partner commissions:

  • Initial challenge purchase: The first buy. This should always trigger commission.
  • Challenge resets: When a trader fails and pays to reset. Most programs pay commission on resets since it is a new purchase.
  • New challenge purchases: When a trader buys a different challenge (different account size). Should trigger commission.
  • Repeat same challenge: When a trader buys the same challenge again after failing. Should trigger commission.
  • Funded account activation: Some firms charge a fee when a trader passes and activates their funded account. Commission is optional here.

Pay commission on every purchase event (challenges, resets, new purchases). This aligns partner incentives with your revenue and makes the program more attractive. Partners will actively encourage their audience to retry after failing, which drives reset revenue.

Tiered Commissions

Like other verticals, tiered structures reward high-performing partners:

Monthly SalesCommission Rate
1-20 challenges10%
21-50 challenges12%
51-100 challenges15%
100+ challenges18%+

Discount Code Economics

Most prop trading partners want to offer their audience a discount code (e.g., 10% off a challenge). You need to decide who absorbs the discount cost: the firm, the partner, or a split.

  • Firm absorbs: The partner earns full commission and the firm covers the discount. This maximizes partner motivation but reduces your margin.
  • Partner absorbs: The discount is deducted from the partner commission. The partner earns less per sale but drives more volume.
  • Split: The discount is shared between firm and partner. For example, on a 10% discount, the firm covers 5% and the partner commission is reduced by 5%.

The most common approach is firm-absorbed discounts with a cap (e.g., up to 10%). This is a marketing cost that drives volume and keeps partners motivated. Track the ROI of discount codes to ensure the additional volume justifies the margin reduction.

Key Takeaways

  • Percentage-based commissions work better than flat amounts because challenge prices vary.
  • Pay commission on all purchase events: initial challenges, resets, and repeat buys.
  • Tiered structures reward top partners and incentivize growth.
  • Decide who absorbs discount code costs: firm, partner, or a split.